ULTRA StrikePractice Cracked [LATEST] 3.7.2-SNAPSHOT

https://discord.gg/92dZQyYmHY | Join for Source Code @ NO Watermark

I have no clue why this resource keeps getting taken down so I'm just gonna keep reuploading it until I get a a valid explanation from staff members.
I know I have provided the discord link but I do not think that is considered advertising as I'm posting the same resource on the discord and I see a BUNCH of resources providing the authors discord invite.

This is your warning to not purchase StrikePractice.

I can explain that I recently had a problem with StrikePractice access on a Discord server. I asked nicely to get my access back in the legitimate way, but according to Toppe, he gave me access for only 5 minutes and changed his mind because I was slightly confused and expected to get a new Jar of StrikePractice. However, since I wasn't home, I didn't think I needed to restart my server. So, in frustration, I said "just activate my fkn strikeprac", which apparently triggered him enough to change his mind and remove my access to StrikePractice.

I maintain that I have not broken the TOS. I used a forked version of StrikePractice called aiPractice, which contained code from StrikePractice that I wasn't aware of. The TOS does mention that you cannot use StrikePractice jar, but I was using aiPractice's jar. So, I wonder if using any Practice Core that contains just one line of sprac's code would be considered breaking the TOS.

Another topic that bothers me is Esta Land, a Bot PvP server that is known for using StrikePractice for their Bot Core. Toppe is a developer of Esta Land, and esta completely leaked aiPractice. If it is breaking TOS for using a forked StrikePractice, then the founders should face consequences for leaking aiPractice, but Toppe still continues to be a Developer on Esta and doesn't seem to care. In my opinion, Toppe should treat everyone equally and give the same consequences no matter if they're friends or not.

When I said "taking my access from StrikePractice," I didn't mean taking it away from SpigotMC. Instead, I meant that the developer goes into Strike's API and disables StrikePractice on my Minecraft server, and my license still remains on SpigotMC, and the plugin becomes unfunctional. Toppe keeps all the money from my purchase, which seems unfair. Basically, If I were to download a new release of StrikePractice from SpigotMC and install it onto my server, it would instantly crash because I'm on the "denylist".

After being rejected access to StrikePractice, I kindly requested a refund from Toppe and gave him two days to respond. Unfortunately, he ghosted me, so I decided to break the TOS for the first time and crack it myself and continue to use StrikePractice the way it's intended. As for the leak, I haven't made a final decision yet. But if Toppe just wants to remove access and keep the money, then I might as well save other customers from going through the same problem.

Please note I would not be leaking/cracking the plugin IF I got my full refund from Toppe.
Do not harass Toppe or any developers of StrikePractice, they wouldn't really care anyway.

If you are reading this and looking for a way to get latest StrikePractice for free and rethemed versions of it and without the watermark saying I cracked it, or even the source code... join the discord @ https://discord.gg/92dZQyYmHY